Compare Heidenheim vs Standard

Heidenheim vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Home Team

Standard Away Team

Heidenheim

48.6

W D W L W D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Standard

65.8

W W D L W L W D D W

Categories Won

Heidenheim

Draw

Standard

Performance Radar

Heidenheim

Standard

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)

C. Nielsen (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14

Home Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

17%

1W / 6 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

100%

1W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Heidenheim

Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2

Defense 40.1

Form 32.8

Consistency 53.2

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2

Defense 81.8

Form 58.5

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

65.4 vs 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 100%

Heidenheim

Standard

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Köln A

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

62%

Bayern Munich A

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

86%

St. Pauli H

German Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

50%

Freiburg A

German Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

72%

Union Berlin H

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

52%

M'gladbach A

German Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

68%

Leverkusen H

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

65%

Frankfurt A

German Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

67%

Hoffenheim H

German Bundesliga

2 - 4 L

65%

Bremen A

German Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

67%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Antwerp A

Belgian First Division A

5 - 0 W

45%

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

54%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

40%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

51%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

57%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

52%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

57%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

57%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

70%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.3 vs 66.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Heidenheim averaging 1.9 and Standard averaging 1.7 goals per match.

Defensively, Standard is far superior, conceding just 0.9 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Heidenheim leaks 1.9 per match.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Standard emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (65.8 vs 48.6) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Standard

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair