Skip to content
Compare Kasımpaşa vs Slaven

Kasımpaşa vs Slaven Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kasımpaşa vs Slaven: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kasımpaşa Kasımpaşa Home Team
Slaven Slaven Away Team
Kasımpaşa
39.5
L D L W D W L W D L

Last 10 Matches

Slaven
31.9
W L D L D L L D L D

Categories Won

9

Kasımpaşa

4

Draw

2

Slaven

Performance Radar

Kasımpaşa
Slaven

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Benedyczak (8 goals)
M. Dabro (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.9

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 57.4

35.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

1.04

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
39.5

Attack: 39.6, Defense: 42.9, Form: 29.7

31.9

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 31.2, Form: 8.5

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

1

16-30'

2

31-45'

5
4

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
Kasımpaşa
Slaven
Kasımpaşa

Power Rating Breakdown

39.5

Overall

Attack 39.6
Defense 42.9
Form 29.7
Consistency 53.2
Slaven

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 31.2
Form 8.5
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

57.4 vs 48.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kasımpaşa logo Kasımpaşa
L
Gençlerbirliği (50%)
D
Kocaelispor (46%)
L
Başakşehir (71%)
W
Alanyaspor (56%)
D
Göztepe (64%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Beşiktaş (65%)
W
Eyüp (53%)
Slaven logo Slaven
W
Gorica (44%)
L
Istra (46%)
D
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
D
Hajduk (53%)
L
Varaždin (54%)
L
Rijeka (44%)
D
Osijek (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gençlerbirliği A
2 - 3 L
50%
Kocaelispor H
1 - 1 D
46%
Başakşehir A
0 - 4 L
71%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 0 W
56%
Göztepe A
3 - 3 D
64%
Kayseri H
2 - 0 W
44%
Beşiktaş A
1 - 2 L
65%
Eyüp H
1 - 0 W
53%
Konyaspor A
1 - 1 D
66%
Rize H
0 - 3 L
59%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
1 - 3 L
46%
Vukovar H
2 - 2 D
32%
Lokomotiva A
1 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
2 - 2 D
53%
Varaždin A
1 - 2 L
54%
Rijeka H
0 - 2 L
44%
Osijek H
0 - 0 D
40%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 4 L
76%
Gorica A
2 - 2 D
50%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Kasımpaşa has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 48.9) compared to Slaven (SoS: 35.1). This means Kasımpaşa's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Kasımpaşa averaging 1.2 and Slaven averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Kasımpaşa conceding 1.7 and Slaven conceding 1.9 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Kasımpaşa has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kasımpaşa

Kasımpaşa

VS
Slaven

Slaven

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more