Skip to content
Compare Kudrivka vs Cremonese

Kudrivka vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kudrivka vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kudrivka Kudrivka Home Team
Cremonese Cremonese Away Team
Kudrivka
38.7
L D L L L L L D D W

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

4

Kudrivka

3

Draw

8

Cremonese

Performance Radar

Kudrivka
Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 3D, 6L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Kozak (2 goals)
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
64.7

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 72.8

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.73

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: -0.13

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 22.9, Defense: 68.8, Form: 11.5

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

2
Kudrivka
Cremonese
Kudrivka

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 22.9
Defense 68.8
Form 11.5
Consistency 74.8
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

72.8 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kudrivka logo Kudrivka
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Obolon (63%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
L
Metalist 1925 (79%)
L
Kryvbas KR (71%)
L
Epitsentr (79%)
L
Polissya (77%)
D
Veres Rivne (62%)
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
83%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
63%
Shakhtar D H
1 - 3 L
78%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 1 L
79%
Kryvbas KR H
1 - 2 L
71%
Epitsentr A
0 - 1 L
79%
Polissya H
0 - 2 L
77%
Veres Rivne H
0 - 0 D
62%
Karpaty Lviv A
1 - 1 D
86%
SK Poltava A
2 - 0 W
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 64.7 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cremonese holds the attacking edge with 0.9 goals per match versus Kudrivka's 0.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Kudrivka has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Cremonese's 1.7.

Kudrivka has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kudrivka

Kudrivka

VS
Cremonese

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more