Compare KuPS vs Radnički Niš

KuPS vs Radnički Niš Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Radnički Niš: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS Home Team

Radnički Niš Away Team

KuPS

40.4

D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Radnički Niš

36.1

W W L W D L L L L D

Categories Won

KuPS

Draw

Radnički Niš

Performance Radar

KuPS

Radnički Niš

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

-5

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Moreno (4 goals)

A. Shestyuk (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

36.1

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

KuPS

Radnički Niš

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3

Defense 54.5

Form 27.2

Consistency 57.7

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 33.2

Defense 42.3

Form 27.2

Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 53.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

KuPS

Radnički Niš

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

SJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 0 D

43%

Oulu A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 2 L

53%

HJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

50%

Oulu H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 2 W

50%

Jaro A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

44%

Gnistan H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 0 W

39%

Ilves A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 1 W

43%

Lech A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

77%

Lech H

UEFA Conference League

0 - 2 L

72%

Crystal Palace A

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

68%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Mladost Lučani H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 0 W

48%

Napredak A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 0 W

34%

FK IMT A

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

63%

Javor H

Serbian Super Liga

3 - 2 W

52%

Radnički Krag A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 1 D

57%

Vojvodina A

Serbian Super Liga

2 - 3 L

68%

OFK H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 2 L

53%

Red Star A

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

74%

Spartak H

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

28%

Radnik A

Serbian Super Liga

2 - 2 D

55%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.8 vs 40.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.1 and Radnički Niš averaging 1.1 goals per match.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Radnički Niš's 1.6.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

Radnički Niš

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair