Compare KuPS vs ZW

KuPS vs ZW Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs ZW: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS Home Team

ZW Away Team

KuPS

40.4

D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

60.1

W W W W W D W L L L

Categories Won

KuPS

Draw

Performance Radar

KuPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Moreno (4 goals)

J. Opoku (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3

Defense 54.5

Form 27.2

Consistency 57.7

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7

Defense 66.8

Form 63.2

Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

KuPS

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

SJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 0 D

43%

Oulu A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 2 L

53%

HJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

50%

Oulu H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 2 W

50%

Jaro A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

44%

Gnistan H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 0 W

39%

Ilves A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 1 W

43%

Lech A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

77%

Lech H

UEFA Conference League

0 - 2 L

72%

Crystal Palace A

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

68%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Dender H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

3 - 2 W

51%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

4 - 0 W

38%

La Louvière A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

42%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

58%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

57%

Gent A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

63%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

67%

Mechelen A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

45%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

ZW has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.4) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means ZW's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

ZW holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 1.2 and ZW conceding 1.1 per match.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

ZW emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (60.1 vs 40.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair