Compare Lens vs ZW

Lens vs ZW Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lens vs ZW: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lens Home Team

ZW Away Team

Lens

58.8

W D D W W L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

60.1

W W W W W D W L L L

Categories Won

Lens

Draw

Performance Radar

Lens

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

F. Thauvin (5 goals)

J. Opoku (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11

Home Win Rate

100%

5W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

50.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 56.0

55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.54

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.24

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

Adjusted Power Rating

58.8

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 50.4, Form: 50.4

60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Lens

Power Rating Breakdown

58.8

Overall

Attack 77.2

Defense 50.4

Form 50.4

Consistency 53.2

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7

Defense 66.8

Form 63.2

Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

77.8 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

56.0 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Lens

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Nantes H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

51%

Nice A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

60%

Brest A

French Ligue 1

3 - 3 D

61%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

4 - 1 W

40%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

3 - 2 W

57%

Lille A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

78%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

5 - 1 W

47%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 0 W

43%

Lyon A

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

54%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Dender H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

3 - 2 W

51%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

4 - 0 W

38%

La Louvière A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

42%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

58%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

57%

Gent A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

63%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

67%

Mechelen A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

45%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 50.7 vs 55.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Lens holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus ZW's 1.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

ZW has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Lens's 1.5.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lens

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair