Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Go Ahead

NAC vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Go Ahead Go Ahead Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead
56.1
L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

1

NAC

3

Draw

11

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

NAC
Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
J. Breum (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

4
2

76-90+'

3
NAC
Go Ahead
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8
Defense 61.9
Form 41.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
L
PSV (75%)
D
Sparta (49%)
D
AZ (67%)
D
Groningen (66%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
W
NAC (49%)
L
Twente (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PSV H
1 - 4 L
75%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
49%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
67%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
66%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
54%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
49%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
76%
Excelsior A
1 - 0 W
60%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 53.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Go Ahead's attack is on another level, averaging 2.0 goals per match with J. Breum leading the charge with 5 goals. NAC manages just 0.8 per match.

Go Ahead has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to NAC's 1.9.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being unlikely.

Go Ahead emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.1 vs 33.2) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-03-15), Go Ahead prevailed 6-0 against NAC. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Go Ahead secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 6-0 scoreline was emphatic — Go Ahead completely dominated NAC in that encounter, raising serious questions about NAC's ability to compete at this level. NAC will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Go Ahead will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Go Ahead

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more