Skip to content
Compare Napredak vs Genk

Napredak vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Napredak vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Napredak Napredak Home Team
Genk Genk Away Team
Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Last 10 Matches

Genk
50.6
W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

1

Napredak

2

Draw

12

Genk

Performance Radar

Napredak
Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 1D, 8L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

0

0

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
A. Bibout (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

5
3

76-90+'

3
Napredak
Genk
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8
Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5
Defense 49.5
Form 42.4
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)
Genk logo Genk
W
Westerlo (45%)
L
Charleroi (51%)
D
Standard (55%)
D
Charleroi (46%)
W
Westerlo (50%)
D
OHL (47%)
W
Antwerp (57%)
D
La Louvière (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Westerlo H
3 - 0 W
45%
Charleroi A
0 - 2 L
51%
Standard H
1 - 1 D
55%
Charleroi H
1 - 1 D
46%
Westerlo A
2 - 1 W
50%
OHL H
0 - 0 D
47%
Antwerp A
2 - 1 W
57%
La Louvière A
5 - 5 D
54%
Freiburg A
1 - 5 L
69%
Sint-Truiden H
1 - 0 W
55%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Genk has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.0) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means Genk's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Genk holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Genk has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Napredak's 2.4.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Genk emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (50.6 vs 25.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Napredak

Napredak

VS
Genk

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more