Thun vs Como Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Thun vs Como: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Thun
Home Team
Como
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Thun
Draw
Como
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
4W, 1D, 5L
5W, 2D, 3L
16 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
+1
+7
0 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2
League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6
0W / 1 matches
1W / 4 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25
Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0
Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Thun
Como
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.
Como has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.4) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Como's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Thun averaging 1.6 and Como averaging 1.8 goals per match.
Como has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.
Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Como emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (62.2 vs 41.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Thun
Como
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams