Thun vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Thun vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Thun
Home Team
Go Ahead
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Thun
Draw
Go Ahead
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
4W, 1D, 5L
4W, 3D, 3L
16 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
+1
+8
0 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
3W / 6 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7
0W / 1 matches
0W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.24
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0
Attack: 46.6, Defense: 43.6, Form: 34.9
Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Thun
Go Ahead
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Go Ahead has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.2) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.3). This means Go Ahead's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Go Ahead holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Thun's 1.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.
Go Ahead has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.
Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.
Go Ahead has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Thun
Go Ahead
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams