Skip to content
Compare Železničar P vs Thun

Železničar P vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Železničar P vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Železničar P Železničar P Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Železničar P
57.4
D W D D L W W L W D

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

8

Železničar P

5

Draw

2

Thun

Performance Radar

Železničar P
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 4D, 2L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Karikari (4 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.2

37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.64

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.06

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
57.4

Attack: 59.6, Defense: 73.6, Form: 42.0

41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

4
3

46-60'

4
3

61-75'

3
6

76-90+'

2
Železničar P
Thun
Železničar P

Power Rating Breakdown

57.4

Overall

Attack 59.6
Defense 73.6
Form 42.0
Consistency 56.8
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

55.2 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Železničar P logo Železničar P
D
Radnik (50%)
W
OFK (53%)
D
Vojvodina (68%)
D
Red Star (69%)
L
Partizan (57%)
W
Javor (56%)
W
Novi Pazar (41%)
L
Čukarički (50%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Radnik H
1 - 1 D
50%
OFK H
2 - 0 W
53%
Vojvodina A
0 - 0 D
68%
Red Star H
2 - 2 D
69%
Partizan A
1 - 2 L
57%
Javor A
2 - 1 W
56%
Novi Pazar H
2 - 0 W
41%
Čukarički A
2 - 3 L
50%
Mladost Lučani H
5 - 0 W
48%
TSC A
0 - 0 D
60%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Železničar P has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.1) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Železničar P's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Železničar P averaging 1.7 and Thun averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Železničar P has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.

Železničar P has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Železničar P emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (57.4 vs 41.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Železničar P

Železničar P

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more