Skip to content
Compare ZW vs Kudrivka

ZW vs Kudrivka Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare ZW vs Kudrivka: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

ZW ZW Home Team
Kudrivka Kudrivka Away Team
ZW
60.1
W W W W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Kudrivka
38.7
L D L L L L L D D W

Categories Won

12

ZW

2

Draw

1

Kudrivka

Performance Radar

ZW
Kudrivka

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Opoku (5 goals)
O. Kozak (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

64.7

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 72.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

0.73

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: -0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

38.7

Attack: 22.9, Defense: 68.8, Form: 11.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

2

31-45'

4

46-60'

1
5

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

3
ZW
Kudrivka
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7
Defense 66.8
Form 63.2
Consistency 43.3
Kudrivka

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 22.9
Defense 68.8
Form 11.5
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 72.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (35%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (51%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (57%)
L
Gent (63%)
Kudrivka logo Kudrivka
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Obolon (63%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
L
Metalist 1925 (79%)
L
Kryvbas KR (71%)
L
Epitsentr (79%)
L
Polissya (77%)
D
Veres Rivne (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
51%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
57%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
63%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
67%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
83%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
63%
Shakhtar D H
1 - 3 L
78%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 1 L
79%
Kryvbas KR H
1 - 2 L
71%
Epitsentr A
0 - 1 L
79%
Polissya H
0 - 2 L
77%
Veres Rivne H
0 - 0 D
62%
Karpaty Lviv A
1 - 1 D
86%
SK Poltava A
2 - 0 W
50%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.4 vs 64.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

ZW's attack is on another level, averaging 1.7 goals per match with J. Opoku leading the charge with 5 goals. Kudrivka manages just 0.6 per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with ZW conceding 1.1 and Kudrivka conceding 1.2 per match.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Kudrivka has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

ZW emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (60.1 vs 38.7) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

ZW

ZW

VS
Kudrivka

Kudrivka

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more