Skip to content
Compare ZW vs Napredak

ZW vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare ZW vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

ZW ZW Home Team
Napredak Napredak Away Team
ZW
60.1
W W W W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Categories Won

12

ZW

2

Draw

1

Napredak

Performance Radar

ZW
Napredak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Opoku (5 goals)
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2
5

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

3
ZW
Napredak
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7
Defense 66.8
Form 63.2
Consistency 43.3
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (35%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (51%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (57%)
L
Gent (63%)
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
51%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
57%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
63%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
67%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

ZW has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.4) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means ZW's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

ZW holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, ZW is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Napredak leaks 2.4 per match.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, ZW is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (59.7), defense (66.8), and form (63.2) leaves little room for doubt. Napredak will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

ZW

ZW

VS
Napredak

Napredak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more