Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Brann

NAC vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

3

NAC

2

Draw

10

Brann

Performance Radar

NAC
Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
K. Ingason (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

5
1

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

4
NAC
Brann
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

NAC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.8) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means NAC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann's attack is on another level, averaging 1.9 goals per match with K. Ingason leading the charge with 4 goals. NAC manages just 0.8 per match.

Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to NAC's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more