Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Epitsentr

NAC vs Epitsentr Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Epitsentr: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Epitsentr Epitsentr Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Epitsentr
63.4
W D D D D L W L W W

Categories Won

0

NAC

2

Draw

13

Epitsentr

Performance Radar

NAC
Epitsentr

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
V. Sydun (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

72.5

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 66.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

2.01

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.31

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

63.4

Attack: 69.4, Defense: 77.6, Form: 49.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

7
2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

2
NAC
Epitsentr
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
Epitsentr

Power Rating Breakdown

63.4

Overall

Attack 69.4
Defense 77.6
Form 49.0
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 66.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 40%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
Epitsentr logo Epitsentr
W
Polissya (77%)
D
Obolon (63%)
D
Veres Rivne (67%)
D
Oleksandria (44%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (81%)
L
Zorya (80%)
W
Kudrivka (55%)
L
Kryvbas KR (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Polissya H
3 - 2 W
77%
Obolon A
2 - 2 D
63%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 3 D
67%
Oleksandria H
1 - 1 D
44%
Karpaty Lviv H
0 - 0 D
81%
Zorya A
0 - 1 L
80%
Kudrivka H
1 - 0 W
55%
Kryvbas KR A
1 - 2 L
76%
Rukh Vynnyky H
2 - 0 W
44%
Kolos H
4 - 0 W
78%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Epitsentr has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 72.5) compared to NAC (SoS: 53.8). This means Epitsentr's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Epitsentr holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Epitsentr has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to NAC's 1.9.

Epitsentr has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Epitsentr is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (69.4), defense (77.6), and form (49.0) leaves little room for doubt. NAC will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Epitsentr

Epitsentr

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more