Compare Napredak vs Mechelen

Napredak vs Mechelen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Napredak vs Mechelen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Napredak Home Team

Mechelen Away Team

Napredak

25.8

W L L L L L L L D L

Last 10 Matches

Mechelen

26.6

L W L L L L D L W L

Categories Won

Napredak

Draw

Mechelen

Performance Radar

Napredak

Mechelen

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

2.4

24 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-16

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)

B. Boersma (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4

Home Win Rate

0W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

17%

1W / 6 matches

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

44.7

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 59.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

0.83

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.03

Adjusted Power Rating

25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

26.6

Attack: 25.3, Defense: 18.9, Form: 18.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Napredak

Mechelen

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4

Defense 18.3

Form 9.1

Consistency 74.8

Power Rating Breakdown

26.6

Overall

Attack 25.3

Defense 18.9

Form 18.9

Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 59.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Napredak

Mechelen

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Spartak A

Serbian Super Liga

3 - 0 W

33%

Radnički Niš H

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 1 L

44%

Javor A

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 4 L

56%

FK IMT H

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 1 L

58%

TSC A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 4 L

60%

Mladost Lučani A

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

53%

TSC H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 2 L

56%

Vojvodina A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 4 L

68%

OFK H

Serbian Super Liga

2 - 2 D

53%

Red Star A

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 4 L

74%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

R. Union SG A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 3 L

69%

Gent H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 0 W

46%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

44%

Club Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 6 L

71%

Anderlecht H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

35%

R. Union SG H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

75%

Gent A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

63%

Club Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 4 L

83%

Anderlecht H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

47%

Gent A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

63%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 41.4 vs 44.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Napredak averaging 0.8 and Mechelen averaging 0.8 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Napredak conceding 2.4 and Mechelen conceding 2.4 per match.

Mechelen has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Napredak

Mechelen

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair